TPCK+Model+and+Implementing+Inquiry

=== TPCK Model **This is about getting technology into the classroom. We know from diffusions of innovation literature that this is probably the toughest part. Luckily, there's a new model that helps us think about how to develop technological pedagogical content knowledge. You can learn more about this model at the website: http://tpck.org/tpck/index.php?title=TPCK_-_Technological_Pedagogical_Content_Knowledge**===

 Last year SIGTE held a webinar featuring Punya Mishra and Matthew Koehler discussing their work with TPACK (Technological, Pedagogical Content Knowledge). Technology Integration in Teaching: The TPACK Framework (webinar archive) [|https://admin.acrobat.com/_ a729309453/p92764644]



[|Technologically Integrated Planning]**-**NECC Webcast **(Judi Harris & Mark Hofler) [|Presentation at NECC with handouts.]**

[| Harris_HoferNECC08Part3.pdf] [| Harris_HoferSSActivityTypes.pdf]

=Web2.0 that Works=

= = Developed by [|Stephanie Sandifer] (author of [|Change Agency])

Web2.0 that Works http://web2thatworks.com/index.php?title=Main_Page NECC Presentation http://web2thatworks.com/index.php?title=NECC Classroom Instruction That Works is a collection of effective strategies culled from a meta-analysis of decades of research on what works in classrooms to improve student learning and increase student achievement. This meta-analysis was conducted by Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock. They combined these effective strategies into nine broad categories and Stephanie correlated them with Web 2.0 tools.
 * [|Identifying Similarities and Differences]
 * [|Summarizing and Note-Taking]
 * [|Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition]
 * [|Homework and Practice]
 * [|Nonlinguistic Representation]
 * [|Cooperative Learning]
 * [|Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback]
 * [|Generating and Testing Hypotheses]
 * [|Questions, Cues, and Advance Organizers>]

http://www.techlearning.com/shared/printableArticle.php?articleID=196605124 http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/file/view/bloom%27s+Digital+taxonomy+v2.12.pdf
 * Andrew Churches work on Bloom's Taxonomy

** =**Levels of Technology Integration into the Classroom**= The Technology Integration Matrix Produced by the [|Florida Center for Instructional Technology], College of Education, University of South Florida © 2007.**
 * http://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/index.html

[|Web 2.0 and PBL]

=TPCK Activity= 1. Get in groups by discipline. Electives (pick a group to join or work together in a group) 2. What are the Essential Instructional Activities you typically use in your discipline? (explore the resources provided in key elements if needed to create your list) 3. Have a discussion and list possible Web 2.0 tools that fit nicely with your disciplines essential instructional activities.
 * 4. Report Out**

Creating Mini-Units of Inquiry
5. Looking at national and state standards choose possible topics and a couple possible objectives you could cover under this topic (this will be adjusted). 6. Decide on a passion-based theme for your unit. (Skateboarding to teach landforms, simple machines, geometry, bios of skateboarders, geogrpahy of where they live, etc.) 7. Create a topical map and then a subject map (choose one or two areas to develop learning activities)[| Mind Mapping Tools] 8. Decide on a kickoff activity -Arouse students’ curiosity and interest with stimulating introduction. Consider visual display of theme as well as introductory activities. 9. Create 2-3 learning activities that teach the objectives you selected from standards. Use Web 2.0 tools as the participatory medium. How will you evaluate mastery of the objectives? Make sure your activities are cross curricular in nature. 10. Decide on a culminating event. Make sure your event includes others and highlights student created artifacts.

Science
 * Examples**

Biology

Social Studies (History, Civics, Economics, Geography)

Math

English, Reading, LA

Electives- (these should be embedded within each unit) Foreign Language Spanish GLobal Studies